🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from intermediaries to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is treading a difficult course since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states used their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if discussions restart.

Trump recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his address to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly sought to impose their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the identical language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more united, and more backing of the administration and the country in the wake of this assault."